TSA unable to find live cat in piece of luggage

Poor kitty. Happy ending, except for the highly x-ray dosed cat.

This is as much to contest NV's inconsistent headline policy as it is to point out TSA's failures. No one can deny we're all paying a significant price for security. What explain's this failure?

I know, it is not the gist of the article, but it's in there, and the headline is accurate. There seems to be much talk about headline accuracy on NV and little consistency in NV policy as some of NV's most favorite practitioners violate the COH all the time with respect to headlines.

So what gives NV staff and writers? Is this an appropriate headline or not?